Créer
Quiz à Choix MultiplesInteractifTéléchargement PDF Gratuit

Reasoning Rigor: The Senior Scholar's Logic Quest Quiz (Hard) Feuille de Travail • Téléchargement PDF Gratuit avec Clé de Correction

Syllogistic validity, nuanced informal fallacies, and Bayesian probability — rigorous evaluation of complex claims to sharpen academic discernment for college readiness.

Vue d'ensemble pédagogique

This quiz assesses high-level analytical skills by challenging students to evaluate the validity of syllogisms, identify nuanced informal fallacies, and apply Bayesian reasoning. The pedagogical approach focuses on the rigorous evaluation of complex claims through a mix of multiple-choice and true-false items that simulate college-level logic requirements. It is an ideal tool for AP English Language or Philosophy courses to prepare students for academic discernment and argumentative writing.

Reasoning Rigor: The Senior Scholar's Logic Quest Quiz - arts-and-other 11 Quiz Worksheet - Page 1
Page 1 of 2
Reasoning Rigor: The Senior Scholar's Logic Quest Quiz - arts-and-other 11 Quiz Worksheet - Page 2
Page 2 of 2
Outil: Quiz à Choix Multiples
Sujet: Arts & Autres
Catégorie: Philosophie
Note: 11th Note
Difficulté: Difficile
Sujet: Logique et pensée critique
Langue: 🇬🇧 English
Articles: 10
Clé de Correction: Oui
Indices: Non
Créé: Feb 14, 2026

Vous n'aimez pas cette feuille de travail ? Générez votre propre feuille de travail Arts And Other Philosophy Logic Critical Thinking en un clic.

Créez une feuille de travail personnalisée adaptée aux besoins de votre salle de classe en un seul clic.

Générez Votre Propre Feuille de Travail

Ce que les étudiants vont apprendre

  • Distinguish between formal and informal logical fallacies in complex argumentative contexts.
  • Evaluate the structural validity of syllogistic arguments independently of the truth value of their premises.
  • Apply Bayesian probability principles to update initial hypotheses based on new evidence.

All 10 Questions

  1. In the context of the 'Gambler's Fallacy,' if a fair coin has landed on heads five times in a row, what is the logically sound evaluation of the next flip?
    A) Tails is 'due' because of the law of averages.
    B) The probability remains 0.5 for heads and 0.5 for tails.
    C) The probability of tails has increased to roughly 75%.
    D) The sequence is now biased, making another heads more likely.
  2. An argument can be logically valid even if all of its premises are factually false.
    A) True
    B) False
  3. Assess this scenario: A politician argues that we should not listen to a scientist's report on oceanography because the scientist once failed their driving test. This is an example of a(n) ________ fallacy.
    A) Genetic
    B) Ad Hominem Circumstantial
    C) Ad Hominem Abusive
    D) Red Herring
Show all 10 questions
  1. Analyze the following: 'If the treaty is signed, trade will increase. Trade has increased. Therefore, the treaty was signed.' Which formal fallacy is committed?
    A) Denying the Antecedent
    B) Affirming the Consequent
    C) Non-sequitur
    D) Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
  2. A researcher assumes that because a specific urban neighborhood has a high crime rate, any individual resident from that neighborhood is likely to be a criminal. This error in logic is known as the ________.
    A) Fallacy of Composition
    B) Hasty Generalization
    C) Fallacy of Division
    D) Ecological Fallacy
  3. In formal logic, the law of non-contradiction states that contradictory propositions cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time.
    A) True
    B) False
  4. Evaluate the strength of this inductive argument: 'Every observed tiger in the wild has stripes. Therefore, the next tiger we see will have stripes.'
    A) Weak/Unsound
    B) Strong/Cogent
    C) Valid/Sound
    D) Deductive/Certain
  5. In Bayesian reasoning, if you receive new evidence that contradicts an initial hypothesis, you must update your ________ probability to reach a posterior probability.
    A) Hypothetical
    B) Likelihood
    C) Prior
    D) Conditional
  6. Which of the following scenarios best demonstrates the 'Sunk Cost Fallacy'?
    A) Investing more money into a failing business because you have already invested a million dollars.
    B) Buying a stock because its price has dropped significantly and you hope it rebounds.
    C) Refusing to buy a new car because the old one is still reliable enough.
    D) Selling a profitable investment to realize gains before the market shifts.
  7. A Reification Fallacy occurs when an abstract concept (like 'The Government' or 'Nature') is treated as if it were a concrete, sentient entity with motives.
    A) True
    B) False

Try this worksheet interactively

Try it now
Grade 11Critical ThinkingFormal LogicPhilosophyArgumentationFallacy IdentificationCollege Readiness
This assessment targets advanced cognitive domains through the lens of formal and informal logic. It covers critical concepts including the Sunk Cost Fallacy, Ecological Fallacy, Affirming the Consequent, and Bayou's Theorem application. The worksheet utilizes multiple-choice, true-false, and fill-in-the-blank formats to test student mastery of logical validity versus soundness. By requiring students to navigate complex scenarios like independent probability events and ad hominem attacks, the material fosters the high-level discernment necessary for collegiate-level humanities and social sciences.

Utilisez cette feuille de travail dans votre salle de classe, elle est entièrement gratuite !

Essayez cette feuille de travailModifier la feuille de travailTélécharger au format PDFTélécharger la clé de réponse

Enregistrer dans votre bibliothèque

Ajoutez cette feuille de travail à votre bibliothèque pour la modifier et la personnaliser.

Foire Aux Questions

Yes, this Logic Quiz is an excellent self-contained lesson for a substitute because the detailed explanations provided for each question allow students to check their own understanding of complex reasoning independently.

Most 11th-grade students will take approximately 20 to 30 minutes to complete this Logic Quiz, as the questions require deep reading and careful evaluation of abstract scenarios.

This Logic Quiz supports differentiated instruction by providing clear rationale for every answer, allowing higher-performing students to tackle advanced concepts like Bayesian probability while others focus on foundational fallacies.

While designed for Grade 11, this Logic Quiz is appropriate for any high school senior or introductory college student looking to refine their rhetorical analysis and argumentative skills.

Teachers can use this Logic Quiz as a mid-unit check to identify which specific fallacies, such as the Sunk Cost or Ecological Fallacy, require more direct instruction before moving on to essay writing.