教師が作成した無料のワークシートを閲覧およびダウンロード
Step into the shoes of a high-stakes editor to dissect subtle bias, logical fallacies, and subversive framing in complex sociopolitical texts.
Epistemological framing, dialectical synthesis, and logical fallacies—sharpen your ability to dismantle sophisticated rhetoric and identify systemic bias in academic discourse.
Examine subtext and rhetorical maneuvers within complex political and philosophical treaties to refine your advanced evaluative synthesis skills.
This quiz assesses foundational recall of critical reading concepts, focusing on distinguishing objective evidence from subjective claims in academic texts.
Synthesize complex arguments and deconstruct high-level rhetorical biases for your next advanced seminar or AP-prep evaluation.
How do hidden ideological frameworks dictate a text's structural integrity? Synthesize complex rhetorical maneuvers and evaluate the validity of high-level academic discourse.
Can you spot the logical leaps in a galactic manifesto? Deconstruct complex rhetorical strategies and evaluate source validity within simulated interstellar debates.
Deconstruct complex rhetorical structures and scrutinize implicit biases within academic and socio-political discourse.
Examine rhetorical nuance and logical fallacies across 10 complex prompts involving historical speeches, scientific abstracts, and socio-political commentary.
Students distinguish verified facts from subjective perspectives using contemporary media examples to sharpen foundational analysis skills.
Moving beyond surface comprehension, students will dissect rhetorical nuance and evidentiary strength in complex philosophical and historical texts.
Sophomores weigh rhetorical ethos against logical fallacies to analyze authorial intent and strengthen their evaluation of complex non-fiction texts.
Follow the flow of information to spot rhetorical tricks and verify facts in modern media and investigative journalism.
Solidify your foundational comprehension by identifying biased rhetoric, verifying evidence sources, and distinguishing objective claims from subjective influence.
Examine the tension between rhetoric and reality by dissecting logical fallacies, implicit bias, and the weight of archival evidence in complex arguments.
Differentiate between verified findings and subjective stance to build a foundational understanding of evidence-based literacy.
Students gain the ability to dismantle complex arguments by identifying logical fallacies and evaluating the credibility of diverse source types.
Sophomores move beyond scanning for facts to dissecting rhetorical strategies and identifying logical fallacies in persuasive arguments.
Examine rhetorical strategies and power dynamics in complex texts to reveal the hidden agendas behind persuasive writing.
Sophomores synthesize rhetorical appeals and evaluate the structural integrity of complex sociopolitical arguments to determine authorial credibility.
