생성
다중 선택 퀴즈대화형무료 PDF 다운로드

Ted Lasso’s Ethics: College Sportsmanship & Applied Philosophy Quiz (Hard) 워크시트 • 무료 PDF 다운로드 정답 키 포함

Develop high-level ethical reasoning through 10 challenging scenarios exploring the intersection of gamesmanship, social contracts, and athletic integrity.

교육적 개요

This assessment evaluates the ability of students to apply classical ethical theories such as deontology, virtue ethics, and utilitarianism to modern athletic scenarios. It employs a case-study based approach to test high-level ethical reasoning and the distinction between formal rules and the spirit of competition. This quiz is ideally suited for undergraduate philosophy or sports management seminars as a formative assessment of moral agency and institutional integrity.

Ted Lasso’s Ethics: College Sportsmanship & Applied Philosophy Quiz - arts-and-other college Quiz Worksheet - Page 1
Page 1 of 2
Ted Lasso’s Ethics: College Sportsmanship & Applied Philosophy Quiz - arts-and-other college Quiz Worksheet - Page 2
Page 2 of 2
도구: 다중 선택 퀴즈
제목: 예술 및 기타
카테고리: 체육
등급: 대학/대학교
난이도: 어려움
주제: 스포츠맨십
언어: 🇬🇧 English
아이템: 10
정답 키:
힌트: 아니오
생성됨: Feb 14, 2026

이 워크시트가 마음에 안 드세요? 한 번의 클릭으로 원하는 Arts And Other Physical Education Sportsmanship 워크시트를 생성하세요.

단 한 번의 클릭으로 여러분의 교실 요구 사항에 맞는 맞춤형 워크시트를 만드세요.

자신만의 워크시트 생성

학생들이 배울 내용

  • Analyze the distinction between formalist and interpretivist theories of sportsmanship.
  • Apply ethical frameworks like deontology and virtue ethics to resolve dilemmas in collegiate athletics.
  • Evaluate the impact of institutional compliance versus individual moral agency in high-stakes competition.

All 10 Questions

  1. In the context of 'Deontology' in sport, how would a collegiate athlete evaluate the use of 'tactical fouls' in the final minutes of a championship game?
    A) Acceptable, as the primary duty is to the team's victory and the utility of the outcome.
    B) Unacceptable, as it violates the categorical imperative to uphold the intrinsic rules of the game regardless of the outcome.
    C) Acceptable, provided the official does not see the infraction and no physical harm occurs.
    D) Neutral, because rules are social constructs that serve the participants' entertainment.
  2. The concept of 'Citius, Altius, Fortius' historically suggests that athletic excellence is intrinsically linked to the moral virtues of the participant, rather than just physical output.
    A) True
    B) False
  3. The ethical tension between 'gamesmanship' (using the rules to gain an advantage) and 'sportsmanship' (honoring the spirit of the game) is best described by the ________ framework.
    A) Social Darwinist
    B) Lusory Attitude
    C) Formalist/Interpretivist
    D) Cognitive Dissonance
Show all 10 questions
  1. An elite cyclist notices their main rival has suffered a mechanical failure during a non-competitive neutral zone. If the cyclist chooses to slow the peloton, which ethical principle are they demonstrating?
    A) Utilitarianism
    B) Virtue Ethics
    C) Egoism
    D) Nihilism
  2. According to the 'Broken Windows Theory' applied to sports, small acts of gamesmanship (like minor flopping) have no measurable impact on the overall integrity of a sport's culture.
    A) True
    B) False
  3. Evaluate the 'Bloodgate' scandal in rugby. Beyond the immediate rule-breaking, why was this considered a supreme failure of sportsmanship at the institutional level?
    A) It involved a failure of equipment that the team did not report.
    B) It demonstrated a premeditated conspiracy to manipulate medical substitution rules, undermining the social contract of the sport.
    C) It showed that the referee was incompetent at spotting physical injuries.
    D) It resulted in a financial loss for the opposing team's sponsors.
  4. When a coach rewards a player for 'simulating' a foul to win a penalty, they are prioritizing performing ________ over moral agency.
    A) Instrumental Value
    B) Intrinsic Value
    C) Aesthetic Value
    D) Sentimental Value
  5. In NCAA athletics, the 'compliance' culture often focuses on avoiding sanctions. How does this differ from the 'ethics' of sportsmanship?
    A) Compliance is proactive; ethics is reactive.
    B) Compliance is about following the minimum legal standard; ethics is about aspiring to the highest moral standard.
    C) Compliance only applies to coaches, while ethics only applies to student-athletes.
    D) There is no difference; they are synonymous in professionalized college sports.
  6. The 'Ethical Egoism' theory argues that an athlete is behaving sportsmanship-like if they help an opponent, but only because it improves their own public brand and endorsement potential.
    A) True
    B) False
  7. A situation where an athlete must choose between reporting their teammate's PED use (honesty) and remaining silent (loyalty) is known as a ________.
    A) Logical Fallacy
    B) Pareto Efficiency
    C) Right-vs-Right Dilemma
    D) Zero-Sum Game

Try this worksheet interactively

Try it now
College PhilosophyApplied EthicsSports ManagementCritical ThinkingFormative AssessmentCharacter EducationTest Prep
This assessment is designed for undergraduate students exploring applied ethics and sports philosophy. It features ten high-complexity items including multiple-choice, true-false, and fill-in-the-blank questions that cover key concepts such as the lusory attitude, formalist versus interpretivist frameworks, and Kidder's right-vs-right dilemmas. The content specifically targets the intersection of athletic gamesmanship and moral philosophy, challenging learners to distinguish between technical compliance with rulebooks and the broader social contract of fair play. It serves as a rigorous tool for evaluating student mastery of virtue ethics, ethical egoism, and the instrumental value of actions in a competitive collegiate environment.

이 워크시트를 교실에서 사용하세요. 완전히 무료입니다!

이 워크시트를 사용해 보세요워크시트 편집PDF로 다운로드정답 키 다운로드

도서관에 저장

도서관에 이 워크시트를 추가하여 편집하고 사용자 정의하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

Yes, this Applied Philosophy Quiz is a robust resource for guest lecturers or substitutes in a higher education setting because it provides detailed explanations for every answer, ensuring students can self-correct and learn independently.

Most college students will require approximately twenty to thirty minutes to complete this Sportsmanship Ethics Quiz, as the questions involve complex scenarios that necessitate careful reading and abstract reasoning.

This Philosophy Quiz can support differentiated instruction by serving as an extension activity for advanced students or as a collaborative small-group exercise where learners debate the ethical merit of each athletic scenario.

While the subject is sports-related, the level of academic vocabulary and philosophical theory used in this Ethics Quiz is specifically designed for college-level students or advanced high school honors classes.

Teachers can use this Sports Ethics Quiz as a mid-unit check to identify if students understand the application of moral frameworks like Utilitarianism and Deontology before moving on to larger research papers or capstone projects.

Ted Lasso’s Ethics: College Sportsmanship & Applied Philosophy Quiz - Free Hard Quiz Worksheet | Sheetworks